+91-9555505981
[email protected]
ARRAYMATIC
Home
Services
Industries
About Us
Hire Developers
Get Quote
ARRAYMATIC

ArrayMatic Technologies

B-23, B Block, Sector 63, Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201301

[email protected]

+91-9555505981

Discover

About UsTechnologyCase StudiesHire DevelopersGet Quote

Services

AI & Machine LearningBlockchain DevelopmentWeb DevelopmentMobile App DevelopmentCloud & DevOpsData & IoT Solutions

Social

FacebookTwitterInstagramLinkedin

Technologies we use

React
Next.js
Node.js
Python
All technologies

© 2026, ArrayMatic Technologies

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy
HomeServicesBlockchainBlockchain Security Audits

Blockchain

Blockchain Security Audits

Thorough smart contract security audits — automated analysis, manual review, and written findings — before you deploy to mainnet with real funds at risk.

Start a projectSee our work

0h

Response time

0+

Projects delivered

0+

Years in production

What it is

A smart contract security audit is a systematic examination of contract code to identify vulnerabilities, logic errors, and economic attack vectors before deployment. Unlike traditional software, deployed contracts cannot be patched — making pre-deployment auditing the primary security control.

What you get

  • Automated static analysis with Slither, MythX, and Echidna
  • Manual code review for logic and access control errors
  • Economic security analysis (oracle, MEV, flash loan vectors)

Find it before attackers do

Over $3 billion was lost to smart contract exploits in the last three years. The majority of these attacks targeted vulnerabilities that a thorough pre-deployment audit would have caught: reentrancy, integer overflow, access control gaps, oracle manipulation, and flash loan attack surfaces.

Our audit process combines automated static analysis (Slither, MythX, Echidna fuzzing) with manual review by developers who have written and attacked production contracts. We produce a severity-graded findings report with proof-of-concept exploit code for high and critical findings, and verified remediation tracking.

We also audit economic security — the game-theoretic attack surface that static analysis cannot find. Price oracle manipulation, sandwich attacks, governance attacks, and tokenomics exploits require reasoning about adversarial incentives, not just code paths.

Key capabilities

What we build for you

Each engagement is scoped to your requirements — these are the core capabilities we bring to the table.

Proof-of-concept exploits for high and critical findings

Severity-graded findings report with remediation guidance

Verified re-audit after fixes are applied

Gas optimisation analysis included

Audit certificate for publication

Our process

Discovery to deployment

A structured, engineering-led approach that moves from understanding your goals to a production system — with no handoff surprises.

Typical engagement

8–16 WEEKS

01

Discovery

We map your goals, constraints, and existing infrastructure. Scope is defined and success criteria agreed before any development begins.

Requirements workshopTechnical audit
02

Architecture

We design the technical approach, select the right tools, and produce a milestone-driven delivery plan with no ambiguity.

Stack selectionDelivery plan
03

Build

Iterative development with regular demos. Code reviews, test coverage, and documentation happen in parallel — not at the end.

Sprint cadenceCode review
04

Deploy

Production release with monitoring setup and handover documentation. We stay close during the first weeks post-launch.

CI/CD pipelinePost-launch support

A single-contract audit of moderate complexity (500–2,000 lines of Solidity) typically takes 1–2 weeks. Large protocol audits covering multiple interacting contracts can take 3–6 weeks. Timeline depends on code complexity, documentation quality, and test coverage provided.

No audit can guarantee zero vulnerabilities — complex systems have emergent behaviours that no single review catches completely. An audit significantly reduces risk by identifying the most common and most critical vulnerability classes. For high-value protocols, we recommend multiple independent audits and a bug bounty programme post-launch.

Source code in a repository, a specification or README describing intended behaviour, any existing test suite, and documentation of any known design decisions or accepted risks. The clearer the specification, the more thorough the audit — auditors can only verify what the code is supposed to do if they know what it is supposed to do.

Work with us

Ready to start a project?

Share what you're building — we'll respond within one business day with questions or a proposal outline.

Get a quoteSee our work